Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Wood
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 29, 1933No. 9183PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Justice. '
This appeal is from an order of dismissal following the sustaining of • the general demurrer to appellant’s third amended original petition, and the refusal of the trial court to permit appellant to amend.
The suit was to recover a balance alleged to be due appellant upon a contract embraced in the following letter from appellees, to wit:
“Brownsville, Texas. July 27, 1928. “Mr. Frank D. Reynolds, Brownsville, Téxas
“Dear Mr. Reynolds: Acting for J. S. Duncan, H. M. Wood, A. Wayne Wood, and myself, I hereby confirm the understanding we have reached with you, as follows:
“You are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schlesinger v. BurlandNew York Supreme Court · 1903
- Lobsitz v. Leffler, Thiele & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Schnabel v. American Educational AllianceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913
- Gannon v. TyreeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
- Isaacsen v. AndrewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Usachem, Inc. v. Howard A. Goldstein and Howard A. Goldstein D/B/A Goldseal AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Denton v. BersetCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948