Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Wood

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1933No. 9183PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice. '

This appeal is from an order of dismissal following the sustaining of • the general demurrer to appellant’s third amended original petition, and the refusal of the trial court to permit appellant to amend.

The suit was to recover a balance alleged to be due appellant upon a contract embraced in the following letter from appellees, to wit:

“Brownsville, Texas. July 27, 1928. “Mr. Frank D. Reynolds, Brownsville, Téxas
“Dear Mr. Reynolds: Acting for J. S. Duncan, H. M. Wood, A. Wayne Wood, and myself, I hereby confirm the understanding we have reached with you, as follows:
“You are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schlesinger v. BurlandNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Lobsitz v. Leffler, Thiele & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  3. Schnabel v. American Educational AllianceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913
  4. Gannon v. TyreeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
  5. Isaacsen v. AndrewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Usachem, Inc. v. Howard A. Goldstein and Howard A. Goldstein D/B/A Goldseal AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Denton v. BersetCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API