Legal Opinion
State v. Liptak
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 17, 1990No. 6681PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § SBa-IBG.1 He claims that the trial court erred (1) in failing to suppress a witness’ in-court identification of the defendant after that court had suppressed an earlier police station photographic identification by the witness as unduly suggestive and unreliable, and (2) in failing to suppress the evidence procured as a result of the warrantless search and seizure of the defendant’s car and its contents from his fenced-in backyard. We find no error.
*250I
The…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. DeFuscoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. SantiagoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. BrocuglioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.