Legal Opinion

Moore v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 9, 1961No. 39008Published

1Opinion

On Motion For Rehearing.

Eberhardt, Judge.

Able counsel for defendant in error, in a motion evidencing exhaustive study of the authorities, particularly those from our Georgia courts, urge that the many cases cited in their motion require a different result. We have read with care all of them, but we do not agree. The cases relied upon fall generally into distinguishable categories of instances where the deceased declarant’s statement was offered as a part of the res gestae but was held, under the circumstances of the case, not to be (W. & A. R. Co. v. Beason, 112 Ga. 553, 37 SE 863; Hunter v.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Smith v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Drawdy v. HestersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Higgins v. TrenthamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. BeasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Rabun v. WynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API