Legal Opinion

Ecklar-Moore Express, Inc. v. Hood

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 13, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULLEN, Commissioner.

In an action to recover for damage done to a large semi-trailer owned by the appellee, Arthur Hood, while being operated under a trip-lease arrangement by the appellant, Ecklar-Moore Express, the jury returned a verdict for Hood in the amount of $2,205. Ecklar-Moore appeals from the judgment entered on the verdict. The main issue concerns the amount of damages.

Although the appellant purports to base its argument on alleged errors in the admission of testimony, we think the argument actually is that the evidence does not support the verdict' and that the damages are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Towles v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  2. Koltinsky v. HollowellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  3. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. LankfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  4. Gheens v. BushCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wittmer v. JonesKentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Rudd Construction Equipment Company, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Clark Equipment Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  3. McCarty v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API