Ecklar-Moore Express, Inc. v. Hood
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
CULLEN, Commissioner.
In an action to recover for damage done to a large semi-trailer owned by the appellee, Arthur Hood, while being operated under a trip-lease arrangement by the appellant, Ecklar-Moore Express, the jury returned a verdict for Hood in the amount of $2,205. Ecklar-Moore appeals from the judgment entered on the verdict. The main issue concerns the amount of damages.
Although the appellant purports to base its argument on alleged errors in the admission of testimony, we think the argument actually is that the evidence does not support the verdict' and that the damages are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Towles v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Koltinsky v. HollowellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Louisville & N. R. Co. v. LankfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
- Gheens v. BushCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wittmer v. JonesKentucky Supreme Court · 1993
- Rudd Construction Equipment Company, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Clark Equipment Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- McCarty v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1985