Legal Opinion

Reinhardt v. City of New Haven

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 18, 1961No. File 91042PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.

The amended complaint is in two counts. The first is against the administratrix of the estate of the deceased fireman-operator of the fire truck involved in the alleged collision with the plaintiff’s vehicle. The second count is against the city of New Haven on the claim that the decedent was acting in the scope of his employment as a fireman of the city and that his acts were not wilful or wanton. The claim for damages is singular in that it appears only at the end of the second count without particular reference to either defendant; it states that “the plaintiff claims $60,000 damages.” The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Porpora v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  2. Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. PettisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  3. Pickett v. RuickoldtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rowe v. GodouSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Keogh v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Wendelin v. RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  4. Terwilliger v. TerwilligerConnecticut Superior Court · 1971
  5. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. FieldingDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API