Danks v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
CAREY, Justice.
At trial in Superior Court, the jury found appellant James Joseph Danks guilty of burglary in the third degree. Subsequently, the appellant renewed a motion for acquittal which had been denied during the trial. The trial Judge held, as a matter of law, that the conviction of burglary in the third degree was unjustified and, over appellant’s objection, ordered a new trial limited to burglary in the fourth degree. A second trial was held and resulted in a verdict of guilty of fourth degree burglary. In this appeal, defendant below makes four contentions: (1) the evidence was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schaffer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- State v. BoylesNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1935
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnnie Marie Sumpter v. James Degroote, Sheriff of Vanderburgh County, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Fillman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969
- Howell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2021