Legal Opinion

Danks v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 3, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAREY, Justice.

At trial in Superior Court, the jury found appellant James Joseph Danks guilty of burglary in the third degree. Subsequently, the appellant renewed a motion for acquittal which had been denied during the trial. The trial Judge held, as a matter of law, that the conviction of burglary in the third degree was unjustified and, over appellant’s objection, ordered a new trial limited to burglary in the fourth degree. A second trial was held and resulted in a verdict of guilty of fourth degree burglary. In this appeal, defendant below makes four contentions: (1) the evidence was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schaffer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
  2. State v. BoylesNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1935
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnnie Marie Sumpter v. James Degroote, Sheriff of Vanderburgh County, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  2. Fillman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969
  3. Howell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API