Legal Opinion

Ulece Montgomery v. Alan M. Uchtman, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 20, 2005No. 03-4201PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

This habeas corpus appeal arises from Ulece Montgomery’s conviction in June 1983 for the murders of two elderly women and his subsequent death sentence. Montgomery argues that the trial and sentencing violated due process and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. He also contends that his waivers of his right to a jury at trial and sentencing were not knowing and voluntary. The district court rejected his claims and denied his petition; so do we.

I. Background

A. The Double Homicide, Trial, and Sentencing

On April 25, 1981, Montgomery beat and strangled to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Keith Miller v. Walter E. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Amerson v. FarreyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  3. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2009
  4. Amerson, Cleophus v. Farrey, Catherine J.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Gire v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API