Legal Opinion

Brand v. Auto Service Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 10, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Tbenohabd, J.

The prosecutor, Is: dor Brand, procured a writ of attachment to be issued out of the Hudson County Circuit Court.

Property of the defendant, the Auto Service Company, was attached under the writ and released by the sheriff upon' the filing of a bond.

The defendant entered no appearance, but moved to quash the writ, appearing specially for that purpose, and not otherwise.

The Circuit Court, made an order quashing the writ of attachment, and this writ of certiorari brings up such order for review.

The validity of the attachment was challenged on…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cartwright v. Hillcrest Investments, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. Pan American Securities Corp. v. Fried, Krupp Aktiengesell-SchaftHudson County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1938
  3. Nanuet Logging Co. v. HansonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  4. Pakusewski v. Ringwood Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  5. State Ex Rel. Cartwright v. Hillcrest Investments, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API