Legal Opinion

The New Brooklyn

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 2, 1940No. 687PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, District Judge.

This matter is before me on exceptions filed by the claimant to a libel in admiralty. The action in rem was brought against the S. S, “New Brooklyn” to recover damages for injuries suffered by, and for the death of, a stevedore employed by a stevedoring company but working aboard the libeled vessel.

The exceptions attack the-libel in two respects: First, because it does not state a cause of action which will lie under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, since the relationship of employer and employee did not exist between the libelant and the libelee, and, secondly,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Warner v. GoltraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Plamals v. S. S. "Pinar Del Rio"Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Kwasizur v. Dawnic S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sieracki v. Seas Shipping Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Eggleston v. Republic Steel CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1942
  3. Baker v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1944
  4. Shelton v. Seas Shipping Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Turner v. Wilson Line of Massachusetts, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API