Legal Opinion

People v. Santiago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 15, 1996No. 1-94-3961PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

Something puzzling, unexplained, and, thankfully, rare happened in this otherwise mundane armed robbery case: the information named the wrong victim and no one in the trial court seemed to have noticed.

Defendant Jose Santiago (Santiago) seeks reversal of his armed robbery conviction. He contends there was a fatal variance between the allegations in the charging instrument and the proof at trial. His contention is based on the undisputed fact that the information identified the wrong person as the victim of the offense charged. We affirm his conviction.

FACTS

Santiago was arrested on February…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. GilmoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. DiLorenzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. The PEOPLE v. FiggersIllinois Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  2. People v. EspinozaIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
  3. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. People v. ReeseAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  5. People v. StephensonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API