Stephen Mayne v. Monaco Enterprises, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtKorsmo, J.
¶1 — Stephen Mayne appeals from the trial court’s rulings compelling arbitration of his employment termination claims and dismissing his action for damages. We conclude that the 2013 arbitration agreement was procedurally unconscionable and remand for arbitration under the 2011 agreement.
FACTS
¶2 Mr. Mayne worked for Monaco Enterprises from 1997 until late 2013. He lived in Massachusetts when initially hired by Monaco but relocated to Texas six years later. In September 2010, Mr. Mayne and his family moved to Spokane to work closer to the company’s home office. The reason for that move is the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Cheek v. United Healthcare of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- David Johnson v. Keybank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Kane v. Mednax Services IncDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2022
- Malakhi Verley, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. United Natural Foods, Inc., a Delaware corporation, et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
- Ohring v. UniSea IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
- Robbins v. Comcast Cable Communications Management LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.