Hudsinus v. Heckler
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLARKSON S. FISHER, Chief Judge.
This action challenges the Constitutionality of the requirement that recipients of Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits must apply for, and accept, Social Security retirement benefits at age 62. As a result of complying with this requirement, plaintiffs cash income was increased beyond the eligibility level for SSI benefits. Plaintiffs ineligibility for SSI benefits caused her to lose collateral benefits, including Medicaid, that are available only to the “categorically needy.” 1 This mandated shift in the source of plaintiffs benefits at age 62…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Archuleta v. BowenDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1987