Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 13, 2007No. CA CR 06-1313PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam Bird, Judge.

Chad Wilcox appeals the revocation of his suspended sentence for possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture methamphetamine. Evidence at the revocation hearing concerned the State’s allegation that Wilcox had violated a condition of his probation as shown by a positive drug test of a urine sample. He asserts that speculation and conjecture were required to support the trial court’s finding that he had willfully and inexcusably violated a condition of his probation. He argues that his revocation should be overturned because proper guidelines and instructions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. City of Little Rock v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hanna v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  3. Brent Lawrence v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API