Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 21, 1974No. 1 CA-JUV 13Published

1DissentEubank, Judge

I dissent from the majority opinion because it is my opinion that there are fact situations where criminal trespass (A.R.S. § 13-712(9)) can be a lesser-included offense to a charge of burglary (A.R.S. § 13-302) and that this is one. This opinion is based upon comments contained in two Arizona Supreme Court opinions: State v. Gomez, 105 Ariz. 424, 466 P.2d 378 (1970), and State v. Hatten, 106 Ariz. 239, 474 P.2d 830 (1970).

In Gomez error was claimed on the basis of the trial court’s refusal to “instruct the jury that criminal trespass as defined in § 13-712(9), A.R.S., is a lesser-included…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SchroederArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Reynolds v. FernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. State v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. HattenArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API