Legal Opinion
Chisnell v. Ozier Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 28, 1942No. 29073PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTurnee, J.
This appeal presents two questions:
1. Do the facts stated in the third cause of action in the amended petition show a cause of action?
2. Was the third cause of action brought within the time limited for the commencement of such action?
Section 8623-28, General Code, provides, in part:
“No creditor of a corporation shall have any claim or right of action against a shareholder as such, other than to reach and apply the debt, if any, of the shareholder to the corporation arising out of his contract of subscription or purchase.”
While we shall keep in mind the trust fund doctrine, its exceptions and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gholson v. SavinOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- Scullin v. Mutual Drug Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by6 opinions
- Koler v. St. Joseph HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Everhart v. Coshocton Cty. Mem. Hosp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
- Snyder v. YoderDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
- Rowe v. BlissOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
- LaFon v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.