Legal Opinion

Harris County v. Charlton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1922No. 3738; Motion No. 5587PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierson, J.

■ In their motion for rehearing, defendants in error call our attention to the item of $497.52, which the trial court found was wrongfully retained from the county funds by defendant in error Charlton, but which was found by said court to be barred by limitation.

The trial court having found and adjudged that this amount of $497.52 was barred by limitation, it would have been proper for us to have affirmed the judgment of the trial court as to this item also.

We therefore grant the rehearing as to this item, and affirm the judgment of the trial court as to it. In all other respects the motion…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hatcher v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Greathouse v. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Bitter v. County.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Linz v. Eastland CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  5. Panhandle Const. Co. v. LindseyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API