Legal Opinion

Austin, Nichols & Co. v. Lingo

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 16, 1920PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Churl, for Baltimore County (Duncan, J.).

1Opinion of the CourtPattison, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for costs in favoa* of the appellees, defendants below, in an action brought against them by the appellants.

Austin, Nichols & Oo., the appellants, in 1916, were engaged in the wholesale grocery business in New York and other cities.

On Feb. 4th, 1916, U. H. Dudley & Co., brokers, of New York, wrote Wm E. Robinson & Oo., brokers of Belair, Maryland, that they had, in Austin, Nichols & Oo., a purchaser for “1,800 cases of No. 3, Standard Tomatoes of 1916 packing at 80c per dozen, f. o. b. Maryland Factory,” and in their letter further stated that “they (Austin,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Colvin v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1810

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reckord Manufacturing Co. v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  2. Romani v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Romani v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API