Legal Opinion

State v. Minett

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 19, 2014No. 2013AP634-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.

¶ 1. Jimmie Minett argues that the circuit court should have granted his motion to suppress evidence found in a strip search because the police violated provisions of the statute regulating strip *486searches, Wis. Stat. § 968.255 (2011-12).1 Because suppression of evidence is not a remedy for violation of § 968.255, the circuit court correctly denied Minett's suppression motion. Minett's arguments concerning his sentence also fail. We affirm.

¶ 2. Police investigation, including multiple controlled buys of heroin from Minett via confidential informants, discovered probable cause to arrest Minett…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ocanas v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. PopenhagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  4. State v. ZieglerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. FordCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API