Legal Opinion

Merritt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 28, 1994No. 94-2063PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARIENTE, Judge.

This appeal follows from the trial court’s summary denial of defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm on all grounds, except for defendant’s assertion that he did not voluntarily waive his right to testify on his own behalf.

On remand, an evidentiary hearing is required only on the question of whether trial counsel was ineffective by depriving defendant of his right to testify on his own behalf at trial. The focus of the inquiry, based on defendant’s sworn allegations, should be whether defendant waived…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Kersey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hicks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. State v. OisorioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Mims v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API