Hancock v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The first special ground of the motion for new trial alleged that the State failed to prove by sufficient evidence that the crime of which the defendant was convicted was committed in Paulding County, in that “the only evidence offered by the State on this question was that of Floyd Ward. . . This witness, after testifying to a number of transactions which happened at a number of places, testified as follows: 'This happened in Paulding County/ Defendant insists that this evidence is not sufficient to show that the deceased, Hoke…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Futch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Dumas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Vann v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Dickerson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Hooper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Cash v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Lathan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.