Kier v. Hill
Idaho Supreme Court
APPEAL from District Court, Boise County. We urge that Mr. Halveston’s testimony was proper, and the objections thereto were not well taken.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from District Court, Boise County. We urge that Mr. Halveston’s testimony was proper, and the objections thereto were not well taken. Plaintiffs deposition shows that he regarded Pierce as his agent in this whole matter; he states in answer to the second interrogatory of his deposition that he received the note and mortgage in question from Pierce and gave him as consideration therefor the sum of $1500. The respondent must, we urge, if this evidence of Kier is taken, be considered as the agent of the latter in this matter, so far as permitting his statements in regard thereto to be…
1Opinion of the CourtQharles, C. J.
— This action was commenced in the district court by the respondent, as plaintiff, to recover a debt secured by a mortgage executed by one J. C. Hill, mortgaging the Friday mining claim as security for a note given by said Hill to J. S. D. Manville and R. F. Cooke, December 24, 1896, for the sum of $500, and which note and mortgage were afterward assigned to the respondent. The cause was submitted to the court upon the evidence of both parties. The findings of the court were made in favor of the plaintiff, and judgment *113therefor entered, granting the relief demanded by respondent in his…
2Cited by2 opinions
- State v. McConvilleIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Creem v. Northwestern Mutual Fire Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1937