Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Ryan

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1930No. Docket No. 7415PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The plaintiff sued for the reasonable value of a “bonus” promised to be paid to his assignor in a letter which read, in part, “I have a job for you. I will give you $50 a week and a bonus to try it out.” The cause was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $5,000. On a motion for a new trial the trial court reduced the verdict to $2,000, and from the judgment for that amount the defendant has appealed upon a bill of exceptions.

Defendant was engaged in a very successful business in the city of New York. Plaintiff’s assignor was employed in a clerical…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toomy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Warren v. MosherArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Payne v. United States ex rel. MosierCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
  4. Nave v. TaugherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Johnson v. Fuller & Johnson Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ware v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Cygan v. MegathlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  3. Muir v. Leonard Refrigerator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Brakensiek v. ShafferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. Sabatini v. HensleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API