Hunter v. Ryan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
The plaintiff sued for the reasonable value of a “bonus” promised to be paid to his assignor in a letter which read, in part, “I have a job for you. I will give you $50 a week and a bonus to try it out.” The cause was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $5,000. On a motion for a new trial the trial court reduced the verdict to $2,000, and from the judgment for that amount the defendant has appealed upon a bill of exceptions.
Defendant was engaged in a very successful business in the city of New York. Plaintiff’s assignor was employed in a clerical…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Toomy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Warren v. MosherArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Payne v. United States ex rel. MosierCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
- Nave v. TaugherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Johnson v. Fuller & Johnson Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ware v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Cygan v. MegathlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Muir v. Leonard Refrigerator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Brakensiek v. ShafferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Sabatini v. HensleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.