Legal Opinion

Rashkin v. Pearce

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 24, 1981No. 79-1503PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HURLEY, Judge.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, contest the entry of an adverse summary final judgment. We conclude that the doctrine of res judicata was erroneously applied and, consequently, we reverse.

Appellants Max and Evelyn Rashkin leased certain property to Appellee Pearce for a term of three years, beginning May *54231, 1973, and ending May 31, 1976. Monthly lease payments were $1,200 plus royalties on milk produced by Pearce and a portion of utility expenses and property taxes. On October 19, 1973, the Rashkins filed suit against Pearce for the rents due since May 31, 1973, milk royalties and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Aeroland Oil CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. Hulley v. Cape Kennedy Leasing Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  3. Ennis v. GiblinSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  4. Aldridge v. Liberty Air, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  5. Rashkin v. PearceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Continental Corp. v. KhanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Milton Rudolph v. Milton F. SteinhardtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  3. First D.M.V., Inc. v. AmsterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API