Martin & Smith v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Georgia
Petition for specific performance. Before Judge Tbomas. Berrien superior court. September 29, 1912.
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
1. An assignment of error upon a refusal to allow an amendment to the petition will not be considered by the Supreme Court where the rejected amendment is not embodied in the bill of exceptions or attached thereto and properly identified by the judge as an exhibit. Ponder v. Quitman Ginnery, 122 Ga. 29 (49 S. E. 746); McGarry v. Seiz, 129 Ga. 296 (58 S. E. 856).
2. Before- equity will-decree specific performance of a contract for the sale of land, at the instance of the purchaser, there must, in the absence of waiver, be an unconditional tender of the purchase-price. An offer to pay the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grace v. MeansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Terry v. KeimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- McGarry v. SeizSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Ponder v. GinnerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- DeGraffenreid v. MenardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fraser v. JarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Chatham Amusement Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Gilleland v. WelchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Roberts v. MayerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Morgan v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.