Legal Opinion

Cedar Rapids Engineering Co. v. United States

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided October 8, 1949No. Civ. No. 330PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVEN, District Judge.

Suit for refund of federal excess profits and declared value excess profits taxes and interest thereon paid for taxpayer’s income tax year 1942, pursuant to a deficiency assessment imposed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue upon the taxpayer and involving the question of the proper time for accruing a capital stock tax liability which arose by virtue of taxpayer’s action increasing the declared value of its capital stock after the conclusion of its capital stock tax year.

Plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as taxpayer, is an engineering company located in Cedar…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Security Flour Mills Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Dixie Pine Products Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Fawcus MacHine Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Atlantic C. L. R. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maine Steel, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1959
  2. Aircraft Steel & Supply Co. v. State Commission of Revenue & TaxationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  3. Rahr Malting Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API