Tucker v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
JOANOS, Judge.
In this appeal of a judgment and sentence for grand theft, appellant contends the trial court committed reversible error in two respects: (1) by failing to make a sufficient and proper inquiry when defendant sought self-representation and waiver of his right to counsel at trial, and (2) by convicting and sentencing defendant without informing him of his right to counsel and without securing a waiver of counsel. We agree on both points and reverse.
On the day of trial, Mr. Murrell, an assistant public defender, was scheduled to represent appellant. During jury selection, Mr.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Keene v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Ausby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Billions v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Sanderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992