Legal Opinion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports

Decided July 9, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Steven A. Schultz Attorney for Dade County Value Adjustment Board Suite 3400, One Biscayne Tower 2 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131-1897

Dear Mr. Schultz:

You ask on behalf of the Dade County Value Adjustment Board substantially the following question:

Where previously completed improved property has been damaged to such a degree that it is no longer fit for occupancy or for its intended use and has not been repaired as of January 1st, do the provisions of s. 192.042, F.S., apply?

In sum, I am of the opinion that:

Where property has been damaged to such an extent that it brings…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Keith Investments, Inc. v. JamesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  2. City National Bank of Miami v. BlakeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  3. Culbertson v. Seacoast Towers East, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. Markham v. KauffmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  5. Forte Towers East, Inc. v. BlakeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API