Legal Opinion
Arida v. Essex Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Niagara County (Fricano, J.), entered November 13, 2001, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law with costs, the motion is denied and the amended complaint is reinstated.
Memorandum: Plaintiffs obtained a money judgment in a negligence action against defendant’s insured, Riverfront Development, Inc. (Riverfront), and commenced this action against defendant to recover the amount of that judgment pursuant to Insurance Law…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- D'Arata v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Worcester Insurance v. BettenhauserNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Markevics v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- In re the Estate of HofmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- HBE Corp. v. Sirius America InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. RICCI, MATTHEWAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. RicciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. RicciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012