Legal Opinion

United States v. Neal T. Roberts and James Albert Robison

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1980No. 78-2738, 78-2806Published

1Opinion of the Court

618 F.2d 530

6 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 671

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Neal T. ROBERTS and James Albert Robison, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 78-2738, 78-2806.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 15, 1979.*

Decided May 7, 1980.

John P. Otto, James H. Kemper, Derickson, Kemper & Henze, Phoenix, Ariz., argued, for defendants-appellants; Marvin Johnson, Phoenix, Ariz., on brief.

W. Ronald Jennings, Asst. U. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.

Before WRIGHT and…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Lawn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API