Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Crook

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 15, 1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Schulz, S.

Upon the judicial settlement of an account, application is made for a trial by jury of the controverted questions of fact arising upon a claim presented against the estate which was heretofore rejected. The petitioner urges that such right exists by virtue of section 68 of the Surrogate’s Court Act. In opposition, *644it is alleged that he is not entitled to such trial as a matter of right and that it should not be granted as a matter of discretion.

So far as I have been able to ascertain, the Court of Appeals has never directly passed upon the question. I do not read Matter of Scovill,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re the Application for a Compulsory Accounting of WoodwardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1918
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of SteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. In Re the Accounting of ScovillNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of BeerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. In re the Estate of HarknessNew York Surrogate's Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re for Letters of Administration on the Goods, Chattels & Credits of HamiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API