Maddox v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Judge.
Appeal from the denial, after an eviden-tiary hearing, of a Rule 27.26 motion. We affirm.
In January of 1981, defendant was convicted of burglary in the second degree and stealing a firearm. The convictions were affirmed by this court on direct appeal. State v. Maddox, 658 S.W.2d 74 (Mo.App. 1983). On July 11, 1984, movant filed a Rule 27.26 motion pro se. Counsel was appointed and duly filed an amended motion. An evidentiary hearing was held, the *11court filed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and denied the motion.
On this appeal, movant asserts the court erred in overruling…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Gordon v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Douglas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Chastain v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- James v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johns v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. GeorgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Nunn v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989