Legal Opinion
Kaplan v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided July 25, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Greco, RJ.
The plaintiff, Michael Kaplan, D.C. (“Kaplan”), a chiropractor, sought in this action to recover from the defendant, Plymouth Rock Assurance Corporation (“Plymouth Rock”), Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) benefits for treatment he provided to one Anziani (“Anziani”).1 After a jury-waived trial, the court entered judgment for Plymouth Rock, and Kaplan filed this appeal. There was no testimony at the trial. Instead, the parties elected to present only documentary evidence.
To prevail, Kaplan had to prove initially that his treatment of Anziani related to injuries Anziani suffered in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Soo Line Railroad Company, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Blanchette v. School Committee of WestwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Otis v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- A.H. v. M.P.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morris v. J J. Best & Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
- Barron v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008