Locher v. Walsh
California Court of Appeal
PETITION for writ of mandate to the board of trustees of the City of Auburn, Placer County. The facts are stated in the' opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Mandamus. It appears from the petition that the city of Auburn, Placer county, is a city of the sixth class; that the persons named as defendants are the duly qualified and acting trustees of said city, and that L. F. Morgan is the duly elected and acting clerk thereof; that, on November 22, 1911, a petition was filed with said clerk praying that a certain ordinance relating to the regulation of the sale of spirituous liquors in said city be submitted to a vote of the electors of said city, which said petition was signed by more than thirty per cent of the entire vote cast at the last…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Conn v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Good v. Common CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Sim v. RosholtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Seibert v. LovellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Davenport v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by15 opinions
- Blotter v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- State ex rel. Topping v. HoustonNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
- Laam v. McLarenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Jenkins v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Chester v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.