Legal Opinion
State v. Roberts
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 14, 1982No. 81-1010PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKrupansky, J.
The first issue to be decided is whether the doctrine announced in State v. Perry (1967), 10 Ohio St. 2d 175 [39 O.O. 2d 189], precludes this court from reviewing any or all of the issues being asserted by the petitioner in this postconviction proceeding.
Ohio’s postconviction relief statute, R.C. 2953.21, provides in part:
“(A) Any person convicted of a criminal offense or adjudged delinquent claiming that there was such a denial or infringement of his rights as to render the judgment void or voidable under the Ohio Constitution or the Constitution of the United States, may file a verified…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by17 opinions
- James Yates Rust, Jr., A/K/A James Yeats Rust, Jr. v. Rex A. Zent, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Lewis Williams, Jr. v. Ralph Coyle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Baston v. BagleyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
- State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.