Legal Opinion

State v. Roberts

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1982No. 81-1010PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrupansky, J.

The first issue to be decided is whether the doctrine announced in State v. Perry (1967), 10 Ohio St. 2d 175 [39 O.O. 2d 189], precludes this court from reviewing any or all of the issues being asserted by the petitioner in this postconviction proceeding.

Ohio’s postconviction relief statute, R.C. 2953.21, provides in part:

“(A) Any person convicted of a criminal offense or adjudged delinquent claiming that there was such a denial or infringement of his rights as to render the judgment void or voidable under the Ohio Constitution or the Constitution of the United States, may file a verified…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. James Yates Rust, Jr., A/K/A James Yeats Rust, Jr. v. Rex A. Zent, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Lewis Williams, Jr. v. Ralph Coyle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. Baston v. BagleyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
  5. State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API