Legal Opinion

Hill v. Kaiser Aetna

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1982No. Civ. 47863PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHITE, P. J.

Plaintiff, respondent and cross-appellant Dennis R. Hill (hereafter respondent) filed a claim with the Labor Commissioner in February of 1978, seeking severance pay and a bonus from defendants, appellants and cross-respondents Kaiser Aetna and KACOR Realty, Inc. (hereafter appellants). The Labor Commissioner ruled that respondent was not entitled to a bonus nor severance pay. Pursuant to Labor Code section 98.2, respondent filed a timely notice of appeal to the Superior Court of Alameda County from the order, decision or award of the Labor Commissioner. After a “de novo”…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Board of Education v. Jack M.California Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Div. of Labor Law Enf't v. Transpacific Transp. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Green v. Travelers Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Salsgiver v. America Online, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Vylene Enterprises, Inc. v. Naugles, Inc. (In Re Vylene Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1989
  4. Churchill v. Winter Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Moncada v. West Coast Quartz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API