Hill v. Kaiser Aetna
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WHITE, P. J.
Plaintiff, respondent and cross-appellant Dennis R. Hill (hereafter respondent) filed a claim with the Labor Commissioner in February of 1978, seeking severance pay and a bonus from defendants, appellants and cross-respondents Kaiser Aetna and KACOR Realty, Inc. (hereafter appellants). The Labor Commissioner ruled that respondent was not entitled to a bonus nor severance pay. Pursuant to Labor Code section 98.2, respondent filed a timely notice of appeal to the Superior Court of Alameda County from the order, decision or award of the Labor Commissioner. After a “de novo”…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
- Board of Education v. Jack M.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Div. of Labor Law Enf't v. Transpacific Transp. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Green v. Travelers Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Salsgiver v. America Online, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Vylene Enterprises, Inc. v. Naugles, Inc. (In Re Vylene Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1989
- Churchill v. Winter Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Moncada v. West Coast Quartz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2013