Legal Opinion

Foreback v. Accuspray Application Technologies

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 2025No. 114813Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Foreback v. Accuspray Application Technologies,

2025-Ohio-4676.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA DEBRA FOREBACK, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 114813 v. : ACCUSPRAY APPLICATION : TECHNOLOGIES, ET AL., : Defendants-Appellees. : JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: October 9, 2025 Civil Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CV-23-989017 Appearances: Nager, Romaine and Schneiberg Co., L.P.A., and Corey J. Kuzma, for appellant. Dave Yost, Ohio Attorney General, Sandra L. Nimrick, Principal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Smathers v. GlassOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Hollins v. ShafferOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Acme Engineering Co. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. In re K.J.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API