Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Michael L. Enas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 29, 2001No. 99-10049Published

1Concurrence

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge,

with whom Judges TROTT, TASHIMA, and WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, join, concurring:

As Judge McKeowns opinion states, the outcome of this case depends on whether the tribal court’s criminal jurisdiction over Michael Enas, a non-member Indian, rests on inherent tribal sovereignty. If the White Mountain Apache Tribe (“the Tribe”) prosecuted Enas pursuant to its inherent sovereign criminal jurisdiction, the dual sovereignty exception would permit the federal government to also prosecute Enas without offending the Double *676Jeopardy Clause. If, however, the Tribe…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Heath v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API