Legal Opinion

In re Rosell's Estate

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 1903Published

Appeal from Surrogate’s Court, Kings County. Application by Rebecca A. R. Barefield for the settlement of her account as administratrix of the estate of Mary E. Rosell. From an order settling the account (74 N. Y. Supp. 472), David H. Rosell • appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHirschberg, J.

On voluntary accounting by Rebecca A. R. Barefield as the administratrix of the goods, chattels, and credits of her mother, Mary E. Rosell, deceased, she charged herself only with dividends on certain stock, amounting in all to'less than $200. The appellant, as next of kin, having filed objections to the account, alleging that the administratrix had not accounted for the entire personal estate, the matter was duly referred for hearing and determination. The referee reported that the administratrix was further chargeable with the sum of $10,271.27 and interest; the principal sum consisting of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. . DavenportNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Robertson v. McCartyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Robinson v. ApplebyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Meislahn v. MeislahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. Meislahn v. MeislahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API