Boynton v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Agreement executed by petitioner and The Cleveland Trust Co.held not to constitute a trust within the meaning of section 219 of the Revenue Acts of 1918 and 1921.
1Opinion of the Court
N. H. BOYNTON, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.
Boynton v. Commissioner
Docket No. 9145.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
11 B.T.A. 1352; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3636;
May 14, 1928, Promulgated
Agreement executed by petitioner and The Cleveland Trust Co.held not to constitute a trust within the meaning of section 219 of the Revenue Acts of 1918 and 1921.
Newton D. Baker, Esq., Amos Burt Thompson, Esq., and David H. Gaskill, Esq., for the petitioner.
George G. Witter, Esq., for the respondent.
Francis P. Farquhar, Esq., as amicus curiae.
ARUNDELL
In this proceeding the petitioner…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Burk-Waggoner Oil Assn. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Garrozi v. DastasSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Berg v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
- Boynton v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.