Legal Opinion

Boynton v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided May 14, 1928No. Docket No. 9145Published

Agreement executed by petitioner and The Cleveland Trust Co.held not to constitute a trust within the meaning of section 219 of the Revenue Acts of 1918 and 1921.

1Opinion of the Court

N. H. BOYNTON, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Boynton v. Commissioner

Docket No. 9145.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

11 B.T.A. 1352; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3636;

May 14, 1928, Promulgated

Agreement executed by petitioner and The Cleveland Trust Co.held not to constitute a trust within the meaning of section 219 of the Revenue Acts of 1918 and 1921.

Newton D. Baker, Esq., Amos Burt Thompson, Esq., and David H. Gaskill, Esq., for the petitioner.

George G. Witter, Esq., for the respondent.

Francis P. Farquhar, Esq., as amicus curiae.

ARUNDELL

In this proceeding the petitioner…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Burk-Waggoner Oil Assn. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Garrozi v. DastasSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Berg v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
  5. Boynton v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API