Legal Opinion

Franks v. Amoco Chemical Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 25, 1972No. 5-6036PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

The appellant claims workmen’s compensation benefits based upon an alleged spinal injury while an employee of the appellee, Amoco Chemical Company. Following a denial of the claim by the referee, the Workmen’s Compensation Commission found adversely to the appellant. The circuit court affirmed the Commission’s finding. For reversal of that judgment the appellant contends only there is no substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding. We must disagree.

We first observe that the burden was upon the appellant to establish his claim for compensation before the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bentley v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. Mayner v. Flyer Garment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. Eubanks v. Wheeling Pipeline, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1971

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board v. Butler Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Williams v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Julian Martin, Inc. v. Indiana Refrigeration Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. Turner v. Lambert Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  5. Northwestern National Insurance v. WeastSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API