Legal Opinion
United States v. Yellow Cab Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 1, 1948No. 46 C 1339PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LA BUY, District Judge.
The amended complaint in this action alleges that the defendants, commencing in early 1929, conspired in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 26 Stat. 209, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2, to restrain and monopolize interstate commerce in (1) the sale of motor vehicles for use as cabs to the principal cab operating companies in Chicago, New York City, Pittsburgh and Minneapolis, and (2) the transportation of railroad passengers and their luggage between railroad stations in Chicago pursuant to contractual arrangements with railroads and railroad…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Columbia Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Donovan v. Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Orvis v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Checker Motors Corporation v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Federal Trade Commission v. Jerry E. Feldman, President, and Checker Taxi Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Parmelee Transportation Company v. KeeshinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.