Legal Opinion

Artis v. U.S. Department of Justice

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 18, 2001No. 01-579PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMANDLE, District Judge.

This matter is an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 by petitioner Randolph Artis, an inmate at FCI Fairton who is serving a lengthy term of imprisonment for beating his wife to death with a baseball bat. In his petition, Mr. Artis claims that his due process and ex post facto rights have been violated because the United States Parole Commission applied the federal parole rules rather than the Army parole regulations to his case. For the reasons discussed herein, the petition will be denied.

I. BACKGROUND

On February 22, 1983,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coder v. O'BRIENDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2010
  2. DeLaCruz v. CurtisDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
  3. Terry Matthew Helvey v. Susan Rudolph, Warden of FCI GreenvilleDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API