People v. Peterson
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMallett, J.
In these consolidated cases, we are asked to revisit our decision in People v Beckley, 434 Mich 691; 465 NW2d 391 (1990), and determine the proper scope of expert testimony in childhood sexual abuse cases. The question that arises in such cases is how a trial court must limit the testimony of experts while crafting a fair and equitable solution to the credibility contests that inevitably arise. As a threshold matter, we reaffirm our holding in Beckley that (1) an expert may not testify that the sexual abuse occurred, (2) an expert may not vouch for the veracity of a victim, and (3) an expert…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- People v. BahodaMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. BeckleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. J.Q.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- People v. LukityMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. LeBlancMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. DouglasMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- People of Michigan v. Dawn Marie Dixon-BeyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- People v. MusserMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.