Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Cumming

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 30, 1999No. 99-1126PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

736 So.2d 1248 (1999)

WAL-MART STORES, INC., Petitioner,

v.

Marlana CUMMING, Respondent.

No. 99-1126.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 30, 1999.

Rachel P. Ray of Bridgers & Gill, Pensacola, for petitioner.

Leslie Hecker, Coral Gables, for respondent.

2Per curiam

Wal-Mart seeks to invoke this court's discretionary certiorari jurisdiction to review a discovery order that requires it to produce what is described as irrelevant information. Because Wal-Mart's has not demonstrated that the order will cause irreparable harm, we dismiss its petition for writ of certiorari. We write to resolve…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allstate Ins. Co. v. BoecherSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Coyne v. SCHWARTZ, GOLD, COHEN, ZAKARINDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Eberhardt v. EberhardtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. Nissan Motors Corp. v. EspinosaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Topp Telecom, Inc. v. AtkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. In Re Commitment of SuttonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Sutton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API