Legal Opinion
In Re Cruchelow
Utah Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1996No. 950171Published
1Opinion of the Court
926 P.2d 833 (1996)
In re Ralph Randall CRUCHELOW, (seeking to be known as Muhammad Lee Kumail).
No. 950171.
Supreme Court of Utah.
July 16, 1996.
Brian M. Barnard, Joro Walker, John Pace, Salt Lake City, for Cruchelow.
Jan Graham, Atty. Gen., Brent A. Burnett, Nancy L. Kemp, Asst. Attys. Gen., for State.
DURHAM, Justice:
Ralph Randall Cruchelow appeals from the trial court's order denying his petition to change his name. We reverse and remand.
On January 3, 1995, while incarcerated at the Utah State Prison, appellant petitioned the trial court to change his name to Muhammad Lee Kumail. His petition…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Application of KnightColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
- Moskowitz v. MoskowitzSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Isom v. CIR. COURT OF TENTH JUDICIAL CIR.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- In Re CruchelowUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re ParrottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.