Legal Opinion

Hickman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 18, 1957No. 15Published

1Opinion of the Court

KANNER, Chief Judge.

The appellant in this case, contending that the evidence did not sustain the charge under which he was convicted, offers two bases of error for reversal of his conviction of the offense of attempted unlawful carnal intercourse with an unmarried female under the age of eighteen of previous chaste character.

There are four material elements that compose the criminal offense of having unlawful carnal intercourse with an unmarried person of previous chaste character under the age of eighteen years; (1) unlawful carnal intercourse, (2) that the person be unmarried at the time of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BowdenSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. Lowe v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  3. Dallas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  4. Alford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API