Legal Opinion
Ki Tae Kim v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 4, 1994No. 92-70780PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
24 F.3d 247
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Ki Tae KIM, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 92-70780.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 2, 1994.*
Decided May 4, 1994.
Before: WRIGHT, SCHROEDER, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM**
2
Petitioner Ki Tae Kim asks this court to review a final order of deportation issued…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Luis Vides-Vides v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Marcelino Toquero v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Percy Briggs Wadman v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- George Bernard Nicholas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Maria Lucila Martinez-Zelaya v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fatos Vasha v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Fatos Vasha v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005