Legal Opinion

Alt v. Gray

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 15, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court, fifth judicial district.

1Per curiam

Assuming that the collector of city revenue of the city of New York, was authorized to, and did rent the premises on behalf of the municipality to the plaintiff, which is a question which we do not determine here, there is no evidence establishing the relation of landlord and tenant between plaintiff and defendant. It appears that the defendant was in possession, that plaintiff demanded rent from defendant, and that none was paid. This is not sufficient to establish a contractual relation between the parties, and there can be no recovery for use and occupation until such relation can be said…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pacific States Corporation v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  2. Thackray v. RitzNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Ernst v. Zeltner Brewing Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
  4. Isaacs v. MinkofskyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API