Legal Opinion
Sylgab Steel & Wire Corp. v. Strickland Transportation Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 28, 1967No. 67 Civ. 316PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WEINSTEIN, District Judge.
The issue posed by this motion to remand (section 1447 of title 28 of the United States Code) is whether this Court has jurisdiction over an action for damages to machinery shipped by motor carrier in interstate commerce because it is one “arising under” federal law. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1337, 1441, 1445. Armed with equally impressive strings of citations, the parties dispute over whether the action necessarily is based upon the 1906 Carmack amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act. 49 U.S.C. § 20(11). It seems surprising to find this question so earnestly…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- North American Phillips Corporation v. Emery Air Freight CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Rettig v. Arlington Heights Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
- In Re Wiring Device Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Marquette Nat. Bank v. First Nat. Bank of OmahaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1976
- First National Bank v. Aberdeen National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.