Legal Opinion

In Re Amico/Tunnel Carwash

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 15, 2004PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

852 A.2d 277 (2004)

371 N.J. Super. 199

In re AMICO/TUNNEL CARWASH.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 27, 2004.

Decided July 15, 2004.

Roger S. Clapp, Summit, argued the cause for appellants John and Virginia Heldon (Cooper, Rose & English, attorneys; Michael S. Rubin and Mr. Clapp, on the brief).

Penny S. Ludman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Meadowlands Commission (Peter C. Harvey, Attorney General, attorney; Patrick DeAlmeida, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel; Ms. Ludman, on the brief).

Gary S. Rosensweig, Princeton, argued the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Texter v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. High Horizons Dev. v. Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. Meadowlands Regional Redevelopment Agency v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  4. Township of Stafford v. Stafford Township Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  5. In Re Senior Appeals ExaminersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Freshwater Wetlands PermitsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  2. In Re Riverview Development, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
  3. In Re Issuance of Access Con. LotNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
  4. Dental Ass'n v. Metro. Life Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  5. In Re Hartz/Damascus Bakery, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API